Medical malpractice is typically assessed according to the accepted "standard of care" for a particular situatuion. In the case of a bad diagnosis, failure to meet the standard of care would be failure to consider the diagnostic possibilities that another reasonably-minded medical professional would have considered in a similar situation. If a doctor’s differential diagnosis did not include your actual illness, or if the proper tests were not performed to eliminate its possibility, it is usually considered medical negligence.
Establishing the standard of care in a improper diagnosis requires the expertise and testimony of medical professionals who are trusted in their field. A skilled medical malpractice attorney has these connections and will use them to prove your case. Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Medical negligence occurs most commonly in situations where doctors dismiss a patient’s symptoms as a minor or temporary concern and fail to provide appropriate treatment or follow-ups. This can lead to serious medical complications. If the accepted standard of care is to treat or look more closely into the symptoms you presented at the time of your visit, you may have a viable medical negligence claim.
A doctor who fails to provide appropriate treatment may also be held responsible under medical malpractice laws. Though it usually happens in cases where patients are wrongfully diagnosed and receive treatment for a condition they do not have, it is possible for a doctor to provide inadequate treatment.
Once again, determining whether or not medical malpractice has occurred requires a knowledge of the accepted standard of care for that situation within the medical community. The experienced medical malpractice lawyers at Morgan & Morgan have the background and connections in the medical world to investigate and prove your claim. If you or a loved one have been injured due to the negligence or malpractice of a healthcare provider, contact us today for a free case evaluation.
Fill out this form for a FREE, immediate Case Evaluation
Recovery in a lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Woman was widowed when her husband died from lung cancer. The total award after apportioning damages based on assignment of fault was $46.3 million.
In a case against R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, attorneys Keith Mitnik, Greg Prysock, Joe Taraska and Katy Massa recovered a $40 million tobacco litigation verdict on behalf of the husband and daughter of a woman who died after smoking two packs of cigarettes a day for 36 years.
Failure to perform a timely C-section resulting in serious injury.
Medication overdose of a 26 week premature newborn against a hospital.
In January 2011, Keith Mitnik obtained an $18.8 million verdict on behalf of a motorcyclist who was rendered a paraplegic when a car pulled out in front of him.
11-year-old girl involved in rear-end motor vehicle accident suffered paralysis from the waist down.
Recovery for national class of poultry workers.
Award for a class of oil, gas and petroleum inspectors paid illegal "chinese overtime" rather than proper time and a half.