
Gentek siding complaints among property owners have been reported, due to what one lawsuit terms a “substantial defect.” Many homeowners have claimed that they experienced problems with the paint peeling, cracking, and chipping on Gentek aluminum and steel siding. Though the product comes with a lifetime warranty for individuals and a 50-year warranty for corporations, the company has allegedly failed to uphold the terms of these warranties. Additionally, it has been alleged that the company knew of the defects in its product and continued to sell it for over a decade.
If you are a homeowner experiencing problems with Gentek siding, contact our product liability lawyers to see if you are eligible to participate in a Gentek class action lawsuit.
Gentek steel siding and aluminum siding have reportedly presented problems to numerous homeowners. Complaints have mostly centered around issues with the paint on the siding, and have included reports of:
Although many of these homeowners are under warranty with regard to their Gentek siding, it has been alleged that the company is not upholding their end of the agreement. According to a Gentek siding lawsuit, homeowners have received a number of insufficient responses to their warranty claims, including small amounts of monetary compensation or offers to repaint the siding. Neither of these satisfies Gentek's liability under the warranty, the suit claims. Furthermore, repainting the siding could allegedly prove problematic for a number of reasons, including inconsistency in color and the potential for other areas of siding to peel down the line, resulting in numerous repaintings over years.
A potential class action lawsuit has been filed against Gentek for selling the defective siding to consumers and failing to adhere to the terms of the warranty. If you are a homeowner who has defective Gentek steel or aluminum siding, contact our product liability lawyers today for a consultation. We provide free case evaluations through the form on this site.
Fill out this form for a FREE, immediate Case Evaluation
Recovery in a lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Woman was widowed when her husband died from lung cancer. The total award after apportioning damages based on assignment of fault was $46.3 million.
In a case against R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, attorneys Keith Mitnik, Greg Prysock, Joe Taraska and Katy Massa recovered a $40 million tobacco litigation verdict on behalf of the husband and daughter of a woman who died after smoking two packs of cigarettes a day for 36 years.
Failure to perform a timely C-section resulting in serious injury.
Medication overdose of a 26 week premature newborn against a hospital.
In January 2011, Keith Mitnik obtained an $18.8 million verdict on behalf of a motorcyclist who was rendered a paraplegic when a car pulled out in front of him.
11-year-old girl involved in rear-end motor vehicle accident suffered paralysis from the waist down.
Recovery for national class of poultry workers.
Award for a class of oil, gas and petroleum inspectors paid illegal "chinese overtime" rather than proper time and a half.