
A potential class action lawsuit against Oreck could compensate consumers who bought the Oreck Halo vacuum or ProShield Plus air purifier products under false pretenses. The company made allegedly false and misleading claims concerning these products’ efficacy in removing common household allergens and pathogens and reducing the risk of or preventing the flu, the common cold, and other ailments. No scientific evidence has been brought forward to verify these claims, which the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ordered the company to stop making.
If you purchased an Oreck Halo vacuum or Oreck ProShield Plus air purifier, you may have grounds for legal action. A potential Oreck class action lawsuit could help you recover compensation to cover the cost of your unit. Fill out our free case review form to find out if you are eligible.
The FTC has charged Oreck with making allegedly false and deceptive claims with regard to these two products. Among the claims that have been called into question are the following:
Since Oreck had no reasonable scientific basis to make the above claims, the FTC has deemed them false until such evidence can be shown. According to the FTC, at the time the claims were made, no scientific tests had been conducted to prove the products could remove allergens or household germs.
The claims made by Oreck were such that consumers may have been misled into buying these products. A potential Oreck class action lawsuit could help consumers recover compensation for the cost of their Oreck Halo vacuum ($599.95) or Oreck ProShield Plus air purifier ($399.95). If you purchased one of these vacuums or air purifying units, contact our Oreck class action lawyers today to see if you are eligible to pursue compensation.
Fill out this form for a FREE, immediate Case Evaluation
Recovery in a lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Woman was widowed when her husband died from lung cancer. The total award after apportioning damages based on assignment of fault was $46.3 million.
In a case against R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, attorneys Keith Mitnik, Greg Prysock, Joe Taraska and Katy Massa recovered a $40 million tobacco litigation verdict on behalf of the husband and daughter of a woman who died after smoking two packs of cigarettes a day for 36 years.
Failure to perform a timely C-section resulting in serious injury.
Medication overdose of a 26 week premature newborn against a hospital.
In January 2011, Keith Mitnik obtained an $18.8 million verdict on behalf of a motorcyclist who was rendered a paraplegic when a car pulled out in front of him.
11-year-old girl involved in rear-end motor vehicle accident suffered paralysis from the waist down.
Recovery for national class of poultry workers.
Award for a class of oil, gas and petroleum inspectors paid illegal "chinese overtime" rather than proper time and a half.