
TrimBoard, a brand of composite wood used for window, door, and other trimming on homes and commercial buildings, has been reported as defective and unsuitable for exterior use due to its issues with retaining moisture. Allegedly, this defect has led to damage to some homeowners’ property, as well as the necessary expense of replacing the TrimBoard.
If you are a homeowner and your building is outfitted with the allegedly defective composite wood trim, contact our product liability attorneys to see if you are eligible to participate in a TrimBoard class action lawsuit.
TrimBoard is often used around windows and doors, as well as on corners of buildings as cornerboard, and generally as trimming, soffits, fascia, or for other decorative and general exterior uses on houses, apartments, and other buildings. Despite marketing describing its durability and ease of use, TrimBoard is allegedly unsuitable for exterior use. Its reported tendency to absorb moisture, even under normal weather conditions, may cause a number of issues, including the following:
These issues can lead to a number of others, including mold, fungus, and insect infestation.
The allegedly defective Trim Board products are also marketed under the names Choice Trim and Pro Trim. Made of glue, waxes, and wood fibers, the product (manufactured by ABT Building Products Corporation and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation) has a surface made of paper that gives it a more aesthetically appealing look. Property owners who unsure if their building was outfitted with this product can speak with the contractor who installed the trim.
If your home or building was constructed with this allegedly defective fiberboard, you may have legal grounds to participate in a TrimBoard class action. Along with the cost of the materials and repairs, property owners could potentially collect damages related to the loss of resale value in their property. Contact our experienced product liability attorneys today to learn more about your legal options and eligibility to collect damages in a Trim Board class action claim. Complete our free case review form today.
Fill out this form for a FREE, immediate Case Evaluation
Recovery in a lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Woman was widowed when her husband died from lung cancer. The total award after apportioning damages based on assignment of fault was $46.3 million.
In a case against R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, attorneys Keith Mitnik, Greg Prysock, Joe Taraska and Katy Massa recovered a $40 million tobacco litigation verdict on behalf of the husband and daughter of a woman who died after smoking two packs of cigarettes a day for 36 years.
Failure to perform a timely C-section resulting in serious injury.
Medication overdose of a 26 week premature newborn against a hospital.
In January 2011, Keith Mitnik obtained an $18.8 million verdict on behalf of a motorcyclist who was rendered a paraplegic when a car pulled out in front of him.
11-year-old girl involved in rear-end motor vehicle accident suffered paralysis from the waist down.
Recovery for national class of poultry workers.
Award for a class of oil, gas and petroleum inspectors paid illegal "chinese overtime" rather than proper time and a half.